an international and interdisciplinary journal of postmodern cultural sound, text and image

 Volume 13, June - October 2016, ISSN 1552-5112

 

 

From Achilles to Zarathustra: Jean Baudrillard on Theorists, Artists, Intellectuals and Others

 

 

Gerry Coulter

 

FacebookTwitterGoogleDiggRedditLinkedInPinterestStumbleUponStumbleUponEmail

                                     

 

 

An excerpt from the newly released book, available here.

 

Barthes, Roland (1915-80, philosopher, literary theorist, and critic). Barthes was a very good friend to Baudrillard and one of his inspirations. In The System of Objects he cited Barthes (1963) on the mythological object that the motorcar had become (25-26). He wrote: “Barthes (see especially 1967) is someone to whom I felt very close, such a similarity of position that a number of things he did I might have done myself, well, without wishing to compare my writing to his” (Baudrillard Live: 204). Barthes and Baudrillard each contributed, in his own manner, to two phases of poststructuralism – Barthes who was there at the birth, and Baudrillard after Barthes’ death in 1980, who deepened and extended a good deal of Barthes’ thought, while exploring the increasingly uncertain (and sometimes chaotic) atmosphere pervading life in poststructural times (see the entry for Michaux; and Barthes, 1968, 1973, and 1974).

 

In the deeply radical amalgam that is poststructuralism, the Barthes-Baudrillard embrace of emptiness (which I take to be a liberating gesture in the thought of both), made significant contributions to five concepts: writing; language, meaning, truth, and the real. These concepts, to which Baudrillard adds reversibility, allow us to divest ourselves of the urge to grant a privileged position to the author and similarly the condition under which any of us seek a fixed identity (Coulter, 2012: 14-34).

 

Baudrillard admired Barthes’ refusal of what was too obvious, “a kind of nausea with received ideas” (The Conspiracy of Art: 83) and Barthes’ writing on photography ([1980] 1993: 95) which challenged him to think the medium through in a different manner as we entered into the digital age. Baudrillard was especially fond of Barthes use of punctum – that absent point, “that nothingness at the heart of the image” (See Art and Artefact: 39, 95; Fragments: 96; The Conspiracy of Art: 73; The Singular Objects of Architecture: 20; Photographies: 139; Exiles From Dialogue: 133; and Barthes, 1964).

 

Baudrillard credited Barthes ([1977] 1994: 94) for inspiring his love of aphoristic fragments (Fragments: 21) and for his wariness concerning language which, as Barthes recognized, continually forces us to speak (Ibid.:52). Baudrillard was also influenced by Barthes’ take on Japan (1982) “the possibility of playing with and transforming the appearance of everything” (Radical Alterity: 68). Baudrillard said that Barthes’ trip to Japan was an “impressionist voyage” (Ibid.: 80) wherein Barthes assembled the signs he did not understand into something that remained a secret even to him (Ibid.: 90). There is evidence here that Barthes played a more important role in Baudrillard’s theorization of seduction than for which Barthes is credited. Following Barthes’ death, Baudrillard felt that the world had taken a different direction, whereas the death of Sartre left the world unchanged (Cool Memories I: 118).

 

              

an international and interdisciplinary journal of postmodern cultural sound, text and image

 Volume 13, June - October 2016, ISSN 1552-5112